Jump to Navigation

Be aware of your health insurance coverage rights during and after divorce

Health insurance is a critical asset nowadays, one which Americans cannot afford to go without. This is why it is so important in divorce to have a plan worked out for ensuring coverage for oneself and one's children. Fortunately, states have recognized this and have put certain protections in place for divorcing couples so that lack of insurance coverage is not an issue.

Under Arizona law, spouse and children who are dependent on the other spouse for health insurance are able to continue being covered under the plan, but the dependent spouse and/or his or her children must take steps to continue receiving coverage. First of all, if a dependent spouse wants to continue their coverage after the divorce is completed, he or she has to contact the insurance company immediately and begin paying insurance premiums within 31 days of the date the insurance coverage would otherwise terminate. This can be done with respect to both oneself and one's children if one is responsible for their care.

In terms of preexisting conditions and exclusions, it is important to know that the insurance company is not able to require proof of insurability or to impose any new conditions other than what was already excluded or not covered before the divorce. The one situation where insurance coverage is not required to be continued is when one would be over-insured when taking into account all sources of insurance coverage.

Because complications can sometimes arise with respect to health insurance in divorce, it is important to work with an experienced attorney who understands your rights and who is able to protect them in court.

Source: Maricopa County Judicial Branch, "Notice of Your Rights About Health Insurance Coverage When A Petition For Dissolution Is Filed," Accessed September 26, 2014.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

How Can We Help?

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

  • Avvo Rating: 10.0 Superb
  • Attorney At Law
  • North Valley Magazine
  • William D. Bishop Sustaining Member | Arizona's finest lawyers
  • For Ethical Standards & Legal Ability: Peer Review Rated Martindale Hubbell 2012
  • Bar Register Preeminent Lawyer: 2012 Martindale Hubbell